On a small, half-acre parcel of land located on Commonwealth Tidelands, a project owner has proposed a high-rise tower containing 175 condominiums, 20,000 SF of retail, and 90 units of underground parking. 75% of the site (15,000 SF) is located within 100 FT of the shoreline. 25% of the site (5,000 SF) is dedicated to open space. Downtown Boston corresponds to the “Downtown Boston” market context in the calculator.
Results and Analysis
The “proposed project” achieves about 192,500 SF of floor area overall and an estimated value of $23-25M
A legally permissible “comparison project” could only contain about 57,000 SF of floor area overall. Assuming a similar program of uses with parking scaled down proportionally, it would achieve a relatively low value of ~$5-$6M.
There is a large value premium of $14-$15M that the proposed project achieves over the legally permissible comparison project.
Figure 1. The scope and estimated land value of the proposed project exceeds that of the comparison project.
Given this discrepancy, the user has two options:
(A) Reduce the scale of the proposed project to fit maximum allowable footprint onsite.
(B) Approve the project as proposed, with the assumption that the project owner must either (i) offset the reduction in public access with onsite benefits or (ii) return compensation to the community in the form of a “financial mitigation” payment. The value premium of $14-$15M could be a source of this compensation back to the community.